Mary Parker Follett Essaytyper

Credit: "Mary Parker Follett" / Marta (CC BY-SA 2.5)

Though she never managed a for-profit enterprise, Follett offered valuable insight on organizational management.

Mary Parker Follett, or the "Mother of Modern Management," believed that management was "the art of getting things done through people." Though she never managed a for-profit enterprise, she offered valuable insight on the importance of "powering with" rather than "powering over," and integrating with employees to solve conflicts. 

"Leadership is not defined by the exercise of power but by the capacity to increase the sense of power among those led," Follett once said. "The most essential work of the leader is to create more leaders."

Follett practiced these principles of coordination that helped develop her theory of management:

  • Direct contact. Direct contact between employees and managers helps organizations avoid conflict and misunderstandings. Holding regular meetings or discussing assignments in person is a simple way to practice this principle.
  • Early stages. Coordination should be learned and mastered straight away. No employee should feel less important than the next; each has a significant role that compliments the roles of others.
  • Reciprocal relationship. Every worker, regardless of their level in hierarchy, is responsible for pulling their weight and integrating with the rest of the organization. No one person should be trying less or more than another – it's a team effort.
  • Continuous process. Coordination must be maintained. Don't just learn it and forget about it; channel it in everything you do.

Known well for her mediating tendencies and managing tactics, Follett created a management theory that is still in favor today. Its main principals include:


Follett thought that workers of all levels should integrate to reach the organization's goals. If conflict arises, there should be a conscious effort to pull instead of push, and to work together as a team. Because each member is doing their part, overall, they'll be more likely to be content with result.

Power with

Rather than establishing a strict hierarchy and delegating power to certain individuals over others, Follett believed that workers should practice co-active power. Powering with their team is better than powering over them; this way, each member feels just as valued as the next.

This is not to say that hierarchy should be eliminated entirely, however. Structure is still crucial, but employees should not feel like they are less valuable than their managers.

Group power

Group power should be valued over personal power. Organizations do not exist for one person's benefit, but rather the entire company of workers. If this selfless mindset prevails, then all workers will feel like they're on the same team, rather than in competition with each other.

Mary Parker Follett
Born(1868-09-03)September 3, 1868
Quincy, Massachusetts, US
DiedDecember 18, 1933(1933-12-18) (aged 65)
Boston, Massachusetts, US[1]
OccupationSocial worker turned management theorist and consultant, political theorist, philosopher, and writer
SubjectManagement and Politics and Philosophy

Mary Parker Follett (September 3, 1868 – December 18, 1933) was an American social worker, management consultant, philosopher, and pioneer in the fields of organizational theory and organizational behavior. Along with Lillian Gilbreth, Mary Parker Follett was one of two great women management gurus in the early days of classical management theory. Follett is known to be "Mother of Modern Management".[2]


Follett was born in 1868 in Quincy, Massachusetts to a wealthy Quaker family. Her family was composed of Charles Allen Follett, a machinist in a local shoe factory, and Elizabeth Curtis (née Baxter) Follett, respectively of English-Scottish and Welsh descent, and a younger brother. Follett attended Thayer Academy, a collegiate preparatory day school in Braintree, while spending much of her free time caring for her disabled mother. In September 1885 she enrolled in Anna Ticknor's Society to Encourage Studies at Home.[3]

From 1890-91, she studied at the University of Cambridge and then moved to study at Society for the Collegiate Instruction of Women in Cambridge (later known as Radcliffe College).[4] For the next 6 years Follett attended the university on an irregular basis eventually graduating summa cum laude in 1898. Her Radcliffe thesis, The Speaker of the House of Representatives, was published in 1896. She would go on to apply to Harvard but would be denied entrance to the university on the basis that she was a woman.[5]

Over the next three decades, she published many works. She was one of the first women ever invited to address the London School of Economics, where she spoke on cutting-edge management issues. She also distinguished herself in the field of management by being sought out by PresidentTheodore Roosevelt as his personal consultant on managing not-for-profit, non-governmental, and voluntary organizations.[6]

Ideas and influences[edit]

Follett’s educational and work background would shape and influence her future theories and writings. One of her earliest career positions would see her working as a social worker in the Roxbury neighborhood of Boston from 1900-08. During this period her interactions with the Roxbury community would lead her to realize the importance of community spaces as areas to meet and socialize.[7]

Her experience in developing vocational guidance and evening programs in public schools, she would develop what would be her life's work and her theories in group dynamics. "The New State", her second writing published in 1918, would evolve from a report into her second published work. This publication would go on to lay the foundational theories for her most important theories and become a major center of attention of her career. [8]

By participating in local recreational, educational, and advocacy groups Parker developed her ideals of participatory democracy and her ideals of society as "integrative." Observing people led Parker to believe that the boundaries of a person's identities are porous, effected by the society around them, and that society in turn is effected by the identities of the people within it. Thus the self and the society, according to Parker, are in a cycle in which they constantly help to create one another.[9]

Organizational theory[edit]

In her capacity as a management theorist, Follett pioneered the understanding of lateral processes within hierarchical organizations (which recognition led directly to the formation of matrix-style organizations, the first of which was DuPont, in the 1920s), the importance of informal processes within organizations, and the idea of the "authority of expertise"—which really served to modify the typology of authority developed by her German contemporary, Max Weber, who broke authority down into three separate categories: rational-legal, traditional and charismatic.[10]

She recognized the holistic nature of community and advanced the idea of "reciprocal relationships" in understanding the dynamic aspects of the individual in relationship to others. Follett advocated the principle of what she termed "integration," or noncoercive power-sharing based on the use of her concept of "power with" rather than "power over."[11]

Follett contributed greatly to the win-win philosophy, coining the term in her work with groups. Her approach to conflict was to embrace it as a mechanism of diversity and an opportunity to develop integrated solutions rather than simply compromising.[12] She was also a pioneer in the establishment of community centers.

Follett's writings[edit]

Follett's unique background often led her to take positions on major issues that mediated between the conventional viewpoints. In The New State, she took the position on societal change that:

It is a mistake to think that social progress is to depend upon anything happening to the working people: some say that they are to be given more material goods and all will be well; some think they are to be given more "education" and the world will be saved. It is equally a mistake to think that what we need is the conversion to "unselfishness" of the capitalist class." [13]

Similarly her position on the Labor Movement was:

Neither working for someone nor paying someone's wages ought to give you power over them." [14]

Transformational leadership[edit]

Ann Pawelec Deschenes (1998) found obscure reference pointing to Mary Parker Follett having coined the term "transformational leadership". She quotes from Edith A. Rusch's The Social Construction of Leadership: From Theory to Praxis (1991):

... writings and lectures by Mary Parker Follett from as early as 1927 contained references to transformational leadership, the interrelationship of leadership and followership, and the power of collective goals of leaders and followers (p. 8).

Burns makes no reference to Follett in Leadership. However, Rusch was able to trace what appear to be parallel themes in the works of Burns and Follett. Rusch presents direct references in Appendix A. Pawelec (Deschenes) found further parallels of transformational discourse between Follett's (1947, 1987) work and Burns (1978).[citation needed]

From The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett (p 247): "Moreover, we have now to lay somewhat less stress than formerly on this matter of the leader influencing his group because we now think of the leader as also being influenced by his group."[11]


Although most of Follett's writings remained known in very limited circles until republished at the beginning of this[which?] decade, her ideas gained great influence after Chester Barnard, a New Jersey Bell executive and advisor to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, published his seminal treatment of executive management, The Functions of the Executive. Barnard's work, which stressed the critical role of "soft" factors such as "communication" and "informal processes" in organizations, owed a telling yet undisclosed debt to Follett's thought and writings. Her emphasis on such soft factors paralleled the work of Elton Mayo at Western Electric's Hawthorne Plant, and presaged the rise of the Human Relations Movement, as developed through the work of such figures as Abraham Maslow, Kurt Lewin, Douglas McGregor, Chris Argyris and other breakthrough contributors to the field of Organizational Development or "OD".[15]

Her influence can also be seen indirectly perhaps in the work of Ron Lippitt, Ken Benne, Lee Bradford, Edie Seashore and others at the National Training Laboratories in Bethel, Maine, where T-Group methodology was first theorized and developed.[16] Follett's work set the stage for a generation of effective, progressive changes in management philosophy, style and practice, revolutionizing and humanizing the American workplace, and allowing the fulfillment of Douglas McGregor's management vision—quantum leaps in productivity effected through the humanization of the workplace.[17]

Later life and legacy[edit]

Follett died on December 18, 1933, in Boston, Massachusetts. After her death her work and ideas would disappear from American organizational and management circles of the time but would continue to gain followership in Great Britain. In the last decades her work has been rediscovered. During the 1960s her ideas would re-emerge in Japan where management thinkers would apply her theories to business.

Management theorist Warren Bennis said of Follett's work, "Just about everything written today about leadership and organizations comes from Mary Parker Follett's writings and lectures."[18]

Her texts outline modern ideas under participatory management: decentralized decisions, integrating role of groups, and competition authority. Follett managed to reduce the gap between the mechanistic approach and contemporary approach that emphasizes human behavior.[19]

Her advocacy for schools to be used after hours for recreational and vocational use affected the Boston area where schools opened their doors after hours for such uses, and community centers were built where schools were not located, a revolutionary concept during the 20th century. Her experience working in this area taught her a lot about notions of democracy and led her to write more for a wider audience – particularly the business world. She believed that good practice amongst business people would have a significant impact on other institutions.[17]


She authored a number of books and numerous essays, articles and speeches on democracy, human relations, political philosophy, psychology, organizational behavior and conflict resolution.

  • The Speaker of the House of Representatives(1896)[20]
  • The New State (1918)[21]
  • Creative Experience (1924) [22]
  • Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett (1942) (a collection of speeches and short articles was published posthumously) [23]


  1. ^Morgen Witzel, The Encyclopedia of the History of American Management, p. 167
  2. ^"The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations"; Talcott Parsons, transl., 1947; distilled from Weber's multi-volume work, "Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft" (Economy and Society).
  3. ^Mary P. Follett: Creating Democracy, Transforming Management, Tonn, Joan C., New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003. p. 34
  4. ^Sapru, R.K. (2010). Administrative Theories and Management Thought. PHI Learning. pp. 160–163. ISBN 8120335619. 
  5. ^Follett, M.P. (1918). The New State, Chapter XIV: The Group Principle at Work".
  6. ^Stohr, Mary, Collins, Peter A., Criminal Justice Management, 2nd Ed.: Theory and Practice in Justice-Centered Organizations (United Kingdom, Taylor Francis Ltd, 2013), 103.
  7. ^The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica (May 4, 2015). "M.P. Follett". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved May 4, 2015. 
  8. ^"Mary Parker Follett: A Public Scholar "Far Ahead of Her Time"", Bassett, D. (Retrieved Dec. 6, 2011). "Mary Parker Follett: A Public Scholar 'Far Ahead of her Time'",; accessed June 5, 2015.
  9. ^Whipps, J (2014). "A Pragmatist Reading of Mary Parker Follett's integrative process". Transactions of the Charles S Pierce Society. 50 (3). 
  10. ^"The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations"; Talcott Parsons (translated 1947); distilled from Weber's multi-volume work, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Economy and Society).
  11. ^ abMary P. Follett. "Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett", ed. by E. M. Fox and L. Urwick (London: Pitman Publishing, 1940)
  12. ^Bassett, D."Mary Parker Follett: A Public Scholar 'Far Ahead of Her Time'",; retrieved December 6, 2011.
  13. ^Follett, M.P. (1918). The New State, Chapter XIV: "The Group Principle at Work"
  14. ^Mele, D (2007). "Ethics in management: exploring the contributions of Mary Parker Follett". International Journal of Public Administration. 30 (4). 
  15. ^Art Kleiner, The Age of Heretics: Heroes, Outlaws, and the Forerunners of Corporate Change, New York: Doubleday, 1996.
  16. ^Kleiner, 1996, pp. 31-59 and photos, pp. 190-91.
  17. ^ abDouglas McGregor, The Human Side of Enterprise (1960) McGraw-Hill, OCLC 573825859.
  18. ^
  19. ^Graham, Pauline. Mary Parker Follett Prophet of Management. Beard Books. ISBN 1587982137. 
  20. ^Follett, Mary Parker. The Speaker of the House of Representatives. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN 1469992841. 
  21. ^Follett, M.P. The New State. Evergreen Review, Inc. ISBN 111202655X. 
  22. ^Follett, M.P. Creative Experience. Martino Fine Books. ISBN 1614275289. 
  23. ^Follett, M.P. Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. Routledge. ISBN 0415279852. 

Further reading[edit]

  • Metcalf, Henry C.; Urwick, Lyndall (2004). The early sociology of management and organizations (edited by Kenneth Thompson): volume 3 dynamic administration - the collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. London, UK: Taylor & Francis e-Library. ISBN 9780415279857. 
  • Graham, Pauline (ed) (2003). Mary Parker Follett - prophet of management: a celebration of writings from the 1920s. District of Columbia: Beard Books. ISBN 9781587982132. Montana, Patrick J.; Charnov, Bruce H. (2008). Management. Hauppauge, NY: Barron's Educational Series. ISBN 9780764139314. 
  • Follett, M.P. (1998). The new state: group organization the solution of popular government - Mary Parker Follett. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 9780271018256. 
  • Follett, M.P. (1949). Freedom and Co-ordination: Lectures in business organization (reprint 1987). New York: Management Publications Trust Limited.
  • Follett, M.P. (1927). Dynamic administration (reprint 1942). New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.
  • Follett, M.P. (1924). Creative experience (reprint 1951). New York: Peter Smith.
  • Follett, M.P. (1920). The new state: group organization the solution of popular government. New York: Longrnans, Green & Co.
  • Pawelec (Deschenes), A. D. (1998). Towards An Understanding Of Transformational Leadership in Education. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education, University of Western Ontario (Online Library Canada).
  • Héon, F., Davis A., Jones-Patulli J., Damart S. (2014). The essential Mary Parker Follett: ideas we need today, Amazon Self-publishing; ISBN 9780993955303
  • "Mary Parker Follett" (2005): Biography Reference Bank (H.W. Wilson).
  • Stivers, Camilla. "Integrating Mary Parker Follett and Public Administration." Public Administration Review 2006: 473. JSTOR Journals.
  • Phillips, John R. "Scholarship And Public Service: The Life And Work Of Mary Parker Follett". Public Voices 11.2 (2010): 47-69. SocINDEX with Full Text.
  • Bathurst, Ralph, and Nanette Monin. "Shaping Leadership For Today: Mary Parker Follett’S Aesthetic". Leadership 6.2 (2010): 115-131. PsycINFO.
  • Snider, Keith. "Living Pragmatism: The Case of Mary Parker Follett". Administrative Theory & Praxis 1998: 274. JSTOR Journals.
  • Stout, Margaret, and Jeannine M. Love. "The Unfortunate Misinterpretation Of Miss Follett". Public Voices 13.2 (2013): 11-32. SocINDEX with Full Text.
  • Stout, Margaret, and Jeannine M. Love (2015) Integrative Process: Follettian Thinking from Ontology to Administration. Anoka, MN: Process Century Press.
  • "Follett, Mary Parker (1868–1933)." (2013): Credo Reference Collections.
  • Parker, L. D. "Control In Organizational Life: The Contribution Of Mary Parker Follett." Academy Of Management Review 9.4 (1984): 736-745. Business Source Complete.
  • Lester, William. "Mary Parker Follett And Transforming Disaster Response". Public Voices 11.2 (2010): 70-76. SocINDEX with Full Text..
  • Morse, Ricardo S. "Prophet of Participation: Mary Parker Follett and Public Participation in Public Administration." Administrative Theory & Praxis 2006: 1. JSTOR Journals.
  • Gibson, Jane Whitney, et al. "Examining The Work Of Mary Parker Follett Through The Lens Of Critical Biography." Journal of Management History (1751-1348) 19.4 (2013): 441. Publisher Provided Full Text Searching File.
  • Fry, Brian R., and J. C. N. Raadschelders. Mastering Public Administration : From Max Weber To Dwight Waldo / Brian R. Fry, University Of South Carolina; Jos C. N. Raadschelders,The Ohio State University. n.p.: Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, 2014., 2014. Texas State - Alkek Library's Catalog.
  • Natemeyer, Walter E., and Paul Hersey. Classics Of Organizational Behavior (edited by Walter E. Natemeyer, Paul Hersey). n.p.: Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, © 2011. Texas State-Alkek Library's Catalog.
  • Witzel, Morgen. The Encyclopedia Of The History Of American Management/General Editor, Morgen Witzel. n.p.: Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum, ©2005. Texas State - Alkek Library's Catalog.
  • "Constructive Conflict: Advice from the Mother of Modern Management". ChangingWinds. N.p., December 16, 2009; retrieved April 21, 2015.
  • Feldham, M.A. (Fall 2004). "Mary Parker Follett: Lost and Found - Again and Again and Again"(PDF). International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior. 6 (4): 341–362. 
  • Stohr, Mary, Collins, Peter A., Criminal Justice Management, 2nd Ed.: Theory and Practice in Justice-Centered Organizations. United Kingdom: Taylor Francis Ltd, 2013.

External links[edit]

0 thoughts on “Mary Parker Follett Essaytyper

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *